Every federal RFP includes a window for questions — a deadline, usually a week or two after the solicitation is released, by which bidders must submit their questions in writing. The answers are published as an amendment that every bidder sees. For a small business, the Q&A period is a gift: it is your only chance to clear up ambiguity, challenge an unfair requirement, and shape the competition before proposals are due. Firms that use it well win more often. Firms that ignore it guess — and guessing is how proposals fail.
Why the Q&A Period Exists
The government is required to treat all bidders fairly. If one bidder gets an answer to a question, every bidder must get the same answer — which is why questions are submitted in writing and answered publicly through an amendment. That fairness rule protects you: it means the information you need is available to you if you ask for it, and it means your competitors cannot get private advantages you do not get.
It also means the contracting officer cannot answer your questions informally. During an open competition, do not call the contracting officer to ask a question about the RFP and expect a private answer — the question belongs in the official Q&A channel, and anything you learn there is shared with everyone. Use the channel properly and you get the information you need without risking a protest or a disqualification.
How to Submit Questions
Section L of the RFP tells you exactly how to submit questions: the email address, the format, and the deadline. Follow it precisely. Questions are usually due by a specific date and time, and late questions are simply not answered. Submit early — not on the last day — so you have time to read the answers and adjust your proposal before it is due.
Put each question in a separate, numbered item, reference the exact section and page of the RFP your question concerns, and quote the language you are asking about. A question that says “Section C, page 12, paragraph 3.2 states X — please clarify whether Y is required” gets a useful answer. A question that says “please explain the requirements” gets a copy of the RFP back. Make it easy for the contracting officer to answer you well.
What to Ask
Ask about anything ambiguous. If a requirement can be read two ways, ask which reading is correct. If a deliverable deadline seems to conflict with another part of the RFP, ask. If a clause seems to require a certification you are unsure about, ask whether it is mandatory at proposal time or at award. If the evaluation criteria in Section M are unclear — for example, how past performance will be scored when you have little of it — ask. Ambiguity you leave unresolved becomes a risk you carry into your proposal; ambiguity you ask about becomes a documented answer you can rely on.
Also ask about fairness issues. If a requirement looks written for a specific incumbent — a strangely specific experience requirement, a certification only one firm holds, a timeline only the incumbent could meet — the Q&A period is the time to raise it. You can ask the government to justify or relax the requirement, and the answer is published for all bidders. You do not need to accuse anyone of anything; a calm, factual question about the basis for a requirement is enough, and it creates a record if the issue later becomes a protest.
Ask about the practical details too: the format of the price volume, whether a particular document is required with the proposal or after award, and how key personnel substitutions will be handled. These small questions save you from compliance mistakes that can disqualify an otherwise strong proposal — which is why they belong on your proposal compliance checklist as well.
What Not to Ask
Do not ask questions that reveal your strategy. If you ask “will the government accept our approach of using subcontractors for X,” you have just told every competitor what you plan to do. Ask about the requirement, not about your solution. Do not ask questions you could answer yourself by reading the RFP carefully — a question that shows you have not read Section L damages your credibility with the buying office. And do not ask the government to do your homework: “what price should we bid” and “who are the other bidders” will not be answered.
Do not submit questions as a way to stall or to fish for information about competitors. The contracting officer can tell the difference between a genuine clarification and a fishing expedition, and it colours how they view your firm. Ask fewer, better questions — five sharp questions beat twenty vague ones. One more rule worth remembering: keep a copy of every question you submit and the amendment that answers it, filed with your proposal records. If a dispute ever arises about what the government required, that paper trail is your evidence.
Reading the Answers
The government’s answers arrive as an amendment to the RFP, posted on SAM.gov. Read it the day it arrives: answers can change the requirements, extend the deadline, or clarify a factor you had misunderstood. Check the amendment against your proposal outline and your compliance checklist, and update both. If the answers raise new questions, check whether a second round of questions is allowed — some RFPs permit it, some do not, and the deadline for a second round is usually short.
If the answers reveal that the opportunity is not a good fit — the requirement is genuinely wired for the incumbent, or a mandatory clause disqualifies your firm — that is valuable information too. Walking away from a bad bid saves you the days you would have spent writing a losing proposal, and it is a decision a good reading of the RFP plus a good round of questions makes possible.
Related Guides
Q&A Period: Keep the Answers With Your Proposal
When the Q&A period closes, save every answer with the RFP, and update your compliance checklist and proposal outline to match the amended requirements. The Q&A period answers are part of the solicitation, so a requirement you read before the answers may no longer be what the agency wants. Check SAM.gov for the amendment the day it is posted, so you are working from the final version, not a draft.
3 Responses